Government innovation labs as intermediaries in public problems in Latin America
Analysis of the Latin American Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v17i3.691Keywords:
Public innovation, Innovation labs, Government, Latin AmericaAbstract
Objective: To investigate the problems associated with the action of the Government Innovation Labs (GILs) established in Latin America and how the solutions designed from their initiatives are characterized.
Method: Based on documentary research, 29 types of projects carried out between 2014 and 2019 by Latin American GILs were analyzed: LABgobar (Argentina), GNova (Brazil), and Laboratorio de Gobierno (Chile).
Main Results: The actions of these organizations were associated with diversified problems, which revealed their own approaches, as well as common interventions. The solutions designed were based on the creation of prototypes, data and evidence gathering, plan design, and conception of digital platforms, among other outcomes. They were also associated to six main needs: improving processes, changing strategies, improving performance, attracting and serving users, supporting the creation of solutions, and contributing to a culture of innovation.
Relevance / Originality: The analysis considered a region still under-represented in the literature. By focusing on the context that underlies the establishment of these arrangements, going beyond their organizational characteristics, it broadens the empirical evidence, still considered scarce, on how such initiatives fit as a tool for governmental structures.
Theoretical / Methodological Contributions: The article contributes to the knowledge about innovation in the public sector, expanding previous reports of how governments have been required to adapt to new demands of society and to promote new practices in public management. Furthermore, it broadens the understanding of innovation laboratories, providing a broader view of the Latin American case.
Downloads
References
Acevedo, S., & Dassen, N. (2016). Innovation for better management: the contribution of public innovation labs. Estados Unidos: IADB.
Arundel, A., Bloch, C., & Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy, 48(3), 789-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001
Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation. Bristol: Policy Press.
Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2011). An innovative public sector? Embarking on the innovation journey. In V. Bekkers, J. Edelenbos, & B. Steijn (eds.), Innovation in the Public Sector, 197-221. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307520_10
Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2018). Innovation in the public sector: Towards an open and collaborative approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 209-213. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0020852318761797
Bloch, C., & Bugge, M. M. (2013). Public sector innovation: from theory to measurement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008
Blomkamp, E. (2018). The promise of co‐design for public policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(4), 729-743. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12310
Capdevila, I. (2015). How can city labs enhance the citizens’ motivation in different types of innovation activities? In L. M. Aiello, & D. McFarland (ed.), International Conference on Social Informatics (pp. 64-71). Cham: Springer.
Cardullo, P., Kitchin, R., & Di Feliciantonio, C. (2018). Living labs and vacancy in the neoliberal city. Cities, 73, 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.008
Carstensen, H. V., & Bason, C. (2012). Powering collaborative policy innovation: Can innovation labs help. The Innovation Journal, 17(1), 1-26.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). Complexity and hybrid public administration—theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organization Review, 11(4), 407-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4
Criado, J. I., Dias, T. F., Sano, H., Rojas-Martín, F., Silvan, A., & Isidro Filho, A. (2021). Public innovation and living labs in action: a comparative analysis in Post-New Public Management contexts. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(6), 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1729181
Criado, J. I., Rojas-Martín, F., & Silván, A. (2017). Laboratorios de innovación para cambiar la gestión pública: análisis del caso NovaGob.Lab. Revista de Gestión Pública, 6(1), 19-42. https://doi.org/10.22370/rgp.2017.6.1.2214
Dente, B., Bobbio, L., & Spada, A. (2005). Government or governance of public innovation? The Planning Review, 41(162), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2005.10556931
De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
Evans, B., & Cheng, S. M. (2021). Canadian government policy innovation labs: An experimental turn in policy work?. Canadian Public Administration, 64(4), 587-610. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12438
Ferrarezi, E., Lemos, J., & Brandalise, I. (2018). Experimentação e novas possibilidades em governo: aprendizados de um laboratório de inovação. Brasília: Enap.
Ferreira, M., & Botero, A. (2020). Experimental governance? The emergence of public sector innovation labs in Latin America. Policy Design and Practice, 3(2), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1759761
Fuglsang, L., & Hansen, A. V. (2022). Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement. Research Policy, 51(1), 104390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104390
Fuglsang, L., Hansen, A. V., Mergel, I., & Røhnebæk, M. T. (2021). Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020058
Gascó, M. (2017). Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.003
Haug, N., & Mergel, I. (2021). Public value co-creation in living labs: results from three case studies. Administrative Sciences, 11(3), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030074
Head, B. W. (2019). Forty years of wicked problems literature: Forging closer links to policy studies. Policy and Society, 38(2), 180-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1488797
Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing public policy: governance in theory and in practice. Sage.
Joy, M., Shields, J., & Cheng, S. M. (2019). Social innovation labs: a neoliberal austerity driven process or democratic intervention? Alternate Routes, 30(2), 35-54.
Kelly, G., Mulgan, G., & Muers, S. (2002). Creating public value: an analytical framework for public service reform. Londres: Strategy Unit, HM Government.
Kim, S., Wellstead, A. M., & Heikkila, T. (2022). Policy capacity and rise of data‐based policy innovation labs. Review of Policy Research, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12494
Kimbell, L., & Bailey, J. (2017). Prototyping and the new spirit of policy-making. CoDesign, 13(3), 214-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355003
Klenk, T., & Reiter, R. (2019). Post-new public management: Reform ideas and their application in the field of social services. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0020852318810883
Lewis, J. M. (2021). The limits of policy labs: characteristics, opportunities and constraints. Policy Design and Practice, 4(2), 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1859077
Lewis, J. M., Ricard, L. M., & Klijn, E. H. (2018). How innovation drivers, networking and leadership shape public sector innovation capacity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 288-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317694085
McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. M. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7
McGann, M., Wells, T., & Blomkamp, E. (2021). Innovation labs and co-production in public problem solving. Public Management Review, 23(2), 297-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1699946
Meijer, A. (2019). Public innovation capacity: developing and testing a self-assessment survey instrument. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(8), 617-627. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498102
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Ministerio del Interior y Seguridad Pública, BID, & Laboratorio de Gobierno (2017). Informe de ideas de solución locales en materias de seguridad. Recuperado de https://www.lab.gob.cl/uploads/filer_public/d4/07/d407849f-3978-4420-86d4-dbfb706e62ec/proyecto_percepcion_seguridad_-_informe_consolidado_de_talleres.pdf
Mosse, B., & Whitley, E. A. (2009). Critically classifying: UK e‐government website benchmarking and the recasting of the citizen as customer. Information Systems Journal, 19(2), 149-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2008.00299.x
Mulgan, G. (2007). Ready or not?: Taking innovation in the public sector seriously. Nesta Provocation 03.
Muzzio, H., & Gama, M. (2021). Collaborative idea generation: An experience of open creativity in the public sector. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2021-0112
Olejniczak, K., Borkowska-Waszak, S., Domaradzka-Widła, A., & Park, Y. (2020). Policy labs: the next frontier of policy design and evaluation? Policy & Politics, 48(1), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420108
Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico (OECD) (2015). The Innovation Imperative in the Public Sector: Setting an Agenda for Action. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Parsons Desis Lab (2013). Government Innovation Lab Constellation. Recuperado de: http://nyc.pubcollab.org/files/Gov_Innovation_Labs-Constellation_1.0.pdf
Pascale, P., & Resina, J. (2020). Prototipando las instituciones del futuro: el caso de los laboratorios de innovación ciudadana (Labic). Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo, 9(1), 6-27. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.437
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Continuity and change in public policy and management. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Potts, J., & Kastelle, T. (2010). Public sector innovation research: What’s next? Innovation, 12(2), 122-137. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.2.122
Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento (UNDP) (2017). Growing government innovation labs: an insider’s guide. Estados Unidos: UNDP.
Puttick, R., Baeck, P., & Colligan, P. (2014). I-Teams: The teams and funds making innovation happen in governments around the world. Nesta.
Ramírez-Alujas, Á. (2016). Laboratorios de gobierno como plataformas para la innovación pública. La Innovación en el Sector Público: Tendencias Internacionales y Experiencias Mexicanas. México: INAP-CIDE.
Rizzo, F., Deserti, A., & Cobanli, O. M. (2017). Introducing design thinking in social innovation and in public sector: a design-based learning framework. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 2(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.17-1.9
Rodríguez, E., & Grandinetti, R. (2018). Laboratorios de gobierno para la innovación pública: un estudio comparado de las experiencias americanas y europeas. Programa CYTED. Recuperado de: https://www.cyted.org/sites/default/files/doc_goblabs_redinnolabs.pdf
Sano, H. (2020). Laboratórios de inovação no setor público: mapeamento e diagnóstico de experiências nacionais. Brasília: Enap.
Scholl, C., & Kemp, R. (2016). City labs as vehicles for innovation in urban planning processes. Urban Planning, 1(4), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i4.749
Schuurman, D., & Tõnurist, P. (2017). Innovation in the public sector: exploring the characteristics and potential of living labs and innovation labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1), 7-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1045s
Timeus, K., & Gascó, M. (2018). Increasing innovation capacity in city governments: Do innovation labs make a difference? Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(7), 992-1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1431049
Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2015). Discovering innovation labs in the public sector. The Other Canon, Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics, TUT Ragnar Nurkse School of Innovation and Governance.
Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017). Innovation labs in the public sector: what they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19(10), 1455-1479. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939
Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: The argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248
Unceta, A., Barandiaran, X., & Restrepo, N. (2019). The role of public innovation labs in collaborative governance: the case of the Gipuzkoa Lab in the Basque Country, Spain. Sustainability, 11(21), 6103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216103
Waardenburg, M., Groenleer, M., & De Jong, J. (2020). Designing environments for experimentation, learning and innovation in public policy and governance. Policy & Politics, 48(1), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15586040837640
Wagenaar, H., & Wood, M. (2018). The precarious politics of public innovation. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 150-160. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i1.1275
Whicher, A., & Crick, T. (2019). Co-design, evaluation and the Northern Ireland innovation lab. Public Money & Management, 39(4), 290-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1592920
Williamson, B. (2014). New governing experts in education: Self-learning software, policy labs and transactional pedagogies. In T. Fenwick, E., Mangez, & J. Ozga, (eds), Governing knowledge: comparison, knowledge-based technologies and expertise in the regulation of education (pp. 1-18). Londres: Routledge.
Williamson, B. (2015a). Governing methods: policy innovation labs, design and data science in the digital governance of education. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 47(3), 251-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2015.1038693
Williamson, B. (2015b). Testing governance: the laboratory lives and methods of policy innovation labs. Stirling: University of Stirling. Recuperado de: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/42544676.pdf
Young, M. M. (2020). Implementation of digital era governance: the case of open data in US cities. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13156
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nayara Gonçalves Lauriano, Marco Aurelio Marques Ferreira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;
- The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s);
- The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
- In case an article will be approved for publication, the author will sign the term of Cession of Copyright to the journal, according to the download form.
