The Role of External Knowledge in the Innovative Activities of Agricultural Biotechnology Multinationals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v16i3.610Palavras-chave:
Innovation, Patents, Multinational Companies, Innovative Scale.Resumo
Objective: To evaluate the influence of external knowledge absorbed on the potential to innovate of multinational companies (MNCs), in the genetically modified (GM) seed sector from 2000 to 2018.
Method: A quantitative approach was applied. Data was composed of the main patents filed by MNCs in the GM seed sector, collected from the Espacenet database, the MNCs’ annual reports, and the INPI database. Variables were analyzed using panel regression model.
Main results: Results showed that the MNCs’ own resources, as well as the external knowledge absorbed were individually significant. The Interactive variable was not significant in the model.
Relevance/ Originality: In addition to addressing literature gaps related for instance to the need to investigate the factors that influence the generation of innovation in multinationals, the present study focused on the agricultural biotechnology sector, which is of paramount importance for the innovations generated in agriculture.
Theoretical contributions: This study contributes by filling literature gaps related to the need to understand how important is the influence of the external knowledge and resources to the innovative capabilities of MNCs.
Social contributions: This paper helps managers be conscious of the fact that innovation is not only developed internally, involving the MNC’s own network, but in fact, innovation requires relationships with other companies, allowing the access of external knowledge and resources.
Downloads
Referências
Almeida, P., & Phene, A. (2004). Subsidiares and knowledge creation: influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9), 847-864.
Altuzarra, A. (2019). R&D and patents: Is it a two way street? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 28(2), 180-96.
Bender, S., & Fish, A. (2000). The transfer of knowledge and the retention of expertise- the continuing need for global assignments. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2), 125-137.
Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. (1998). Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management, 23(4), 773-795.
Carayannopoulos, S., & Auster, E. R. (2010). External knowledge sourcing in biotechnology through acquisition versus alliance: A KBV approach. Research Policy, 39(2), 254-267.
Castro, B. S. (2006). O processo de institucionalização da soja transgênica no Brasil nos anos de 2003 e 2005: a partir da perspectiva das redes sociais. Unpublished master’s thesis, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.
Caves, R, E. (1974). Multinational firms, competition, and productivity in host-country markets. Economica, 41(162), 176-193.
Chen, F., Liu, H., & Ge, Y. (2021). How does integration affect industrial innovation through networks in technology-sourcing overseas M&A? A comparison between China and the US. Journal of Business Research, 122(C), 281-292.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(35), 128-152.
Crespi, G., & Zuniga, P. (2012). Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries. World Development, 40(2), 273-290.
Crespo, C. F., Lages, L. F., & Crespo, N. F. (2020). Improving subsidiaries’ innovation through knowledge inflows from headquarters and peer subsidiaries. Journal of International Management, 26(4), 1-16.
Croissant, Y., & Millo, J. (2008). Panel Data Econometrics in R: The plm Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 27(2), 1-43.
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147-162.
Dost, M., Badir, Y. F., Sambasivan, M., & Umrani, W. A. (2020). Open-and-closed process innovation generation and adoption: analyzing the effects of sources of knowledge. Technology in Society, 62, 101309.
Dourado, A. L. F., Figueira, M., & Castro, C. C. (2019). Analysis of born globals internationalization strategy and partnerships. International Journal of Strategic Business Alliances, 6(4), 217-232.
Duarte, P. C., Lamounier, W. M., & Takamatsu, R. T. (2007, July 26-27). Modelos econométricos para dados em painel: aspectos teóricos e exemplos de aplicação à pesquisa em contabilidade e finanças. Paper presented at the 7th Congresso USP de Controladoria e Contabilidade and 4th Congresso USP de Iniciação Científica em Contabilidade. São Paulo, Brazil.
Dunning, J. H. (2000). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 9(2), 163-190.
Ferraris, A., Bogers, M. L. A. M., & Bresciani, S. (2020). Subsidiary innovation performance: balancing external knowledge sources and internal embeddedness. Journal of International Management, 26(4), 100794.
Figueiredo, P. N., Larsen, H., & Hansen, U. E. (2020). The role of interactive learning in innovation capability building in multinational subsidiaries: A micro-level study of biotechnology in Brazil. Research Policy, 49(6), 103995.
Fu, X., Emes, D., & Hou, J. (2021). Multinational enterprises and structural transformation in emerging and developing countries: a survey of the literature. International Business Review, 30(2), 101801.
García-Vega, M., Hofmann, P., & Kneller, R. (2019). Multinationals and the globalization of R&D. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 63(C), 583-614.
Gilbert, M., & Hayes, C. M. (1996). Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation. Technovation,16(6), 301-12.
Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90-91, 102098.
Granstrand, O., Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1998). Multi-technology corporations: why they have distributed rather than distinctive competencies. California Management Review, 39(4).
Grant, R, M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
Greene, W, H. (2008). Econometric Analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Gujarati, D. (2012). Econometrics by example. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397-420.
Ha, Y., J. (2021). Attention green aliens? Activities of multinational enterprises in host countries and eco-innovation diffusion. Journal of Business Research, 123(C), 32-43.
Hansen, U. E., Larsen, T. H., Bhasin, S., Burgers, R., & Larsen, H. (2020). Innovation capability building in subsidiaries of multinational companies in emerging economies: insights from the wind turbine industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118746.
Hossain, M. (2021). Frugal innovation and sustainable business models. Technology in Society, 64, 101508.
Howard, P. H. (2009). Visualizing consolidation in the global seed industry: 1996-2008. Sustainability, 1(4), 1266-1287.
Iammarino, S., & McCann, P. (2013). Multinationals and economic geography: location technology, and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Inkpen, A. C., & Dinur, A. (1998). Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science, 9(4), 454-68.
Kmenta, J. (1971). Elements of econometrics. New York: MacMillan.
Knight, G., & Cavusgil, S.T. (2009). Born global firms: a new international enterprise. New York: Business Expert Press.
Kurth, T., Möller, C., Jerratsch, J. Adolphs, B., Wübbels, G., & Walker, D. (2020). Reviving agricultural innovation in seeds and crop protection. Retrieved April 30, 2021, from https://www.bcg.com/publications/2020/reviving-agricultural-innovation-seeds-crop-protection.
Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2012). Elucidation and enhancement of knowledge and technology transfer business models. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 42(1), 94-116.
Manogna, R. L., Mishra, A. K., & Sinha, A. K. (2020). Does institutional ownership affect firms' international investments? Empirical evidence from India. Journal of Strategy and Management, 14(1), 50-63.
McBeath A., & Ball, P. (2012). Towards a framework for transferring technology knowledge between facilities. Strategic Outsourcing: an International Journal, 5(3), 213-231.
Medasea, S. K., & Abdul-Basit, S. (2020). External knowledge modes and firm-level innovation performance: empirical evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 81-95.
Montagu, M. Van. (2020). The future of plant biotechnology in a globalized and environmentally endangered world. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 43(1), 1-11.
Mudambi, N, P. (2004). Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 385-406.
Nagaoka, S., Motohashi, K., & Goto, A. (2010). Patent statistics as an innovation indicator. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. 2 (1st ed., pp. 1083-1127), Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (2005). Uma teoria evolucionária da mudança econômica. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.
Neves, P. C., Afonso, O., Silva, D., & Sochirca, E. (2021). The link between intellectual property rights, innovation, and growth: A meta-analysis. Economic Modelling, 97, 196-209.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005). Oslo Manual: the measurement of scientific and technological activities. Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. (3rd ed.). Paris: OECD, Eurostat.
Papanastassiou, M., Pearce, R., & Zanfei, A. (2020). Changing perspectives on the internationalization of R&D and innovation by multinational enterprises: A review of the literature. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(4), 623-664.
Paswan, A. K, & Panda, S. (2020). B-to-B relationships: a resource, knowledge, and capability (RKC) perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 91(5), 92-99.
Pereira, C. G., Da Silva, R. R., Lavoie, J.R., Porto, G.S. (2018). Technological cooperation network in biotechnology. Analysis of patents with Brazil as the priority country. Innovation & Management Review, 15(4), 416-434.
Phene, A., Almeida, P. (2003). How do firms evolve? The patterns of technological evolution of semiconductor subsidiaries. International Business Review, 12(3), 349-367.
Phene, A., & Almeida, P. (2008). Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 901-919.
Powell, W., & Grodal, S. (2006). Networks of innovators. In J. Fegerberg, D. C. Mowery, R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, (pp. 56-85), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ritala, P., & Stefan, I. (2021). A paradox within the paradox of openness: the knowledge leveraging conundrum in open innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 93(2), 281-292.
Rodrigues, L. (2018). Fusões e aquisições recentes no agronegócio preocupam produtor brasileiro. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from https://www.correiobraziliense.com.br/app/noticia/economia/2018/04/27/internas_economia,676657/por-que-produtores-se-preocupam-com-fusoes-e-aquisicoes-no- agronegocio.shtml.
Scott-Kennel, J., & Saittakari, I. (2020). Sourcing or sharing in MNE networks? National headquarters and foreign subsidiaries as knowledge conduits in SMOPECs. International Business Review, 29(1), 101622.
Sharma, D. D., & Blomstermo, A. (2003). The internationalization process of born globals: a network view. International Business Review, 12(6), 739-753.
Sierotowicz, T. (2015). Patent activity as an effect of the research and development of the business enterprise sectors in the countries of the European Union. Journal of International Studies, 8(2), 101–113.
Silveira, R. (2018). Como fica o mercado com a fusão Bayer e Monsanto? Retrieved July 21, 2018, from https://canalrural.uol.com.br/programas/como-fica-mercado-com-fusao-bayer-monsanto-72672/.
Silveira, J. M. F. J, Dal Poz, M. E., Massago, F. K., & Campos, R. (2011). Caracterização da trajetória tecnológica da biotecnologia agrícola por meio de redes de patentes. Revista Gestão e Políticas Públicas, 1(2), 163-187.
Singh, D. A., & Gaur, A. S. (2013). Governance Structure, Innovation and Internationalization: Evidence from India. Journal of International Management, 19, 300-309.
Su, C., Kong, L., Ciabuschi, F., & Yan, H. (2021). Reverse innovation transfer in Chinese MNCs: The role of political ties and headquarters. Journal of International Management, 27(1), 100829.
Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing innovation, integration technological, market and organizational change. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Un, C. A., & Rodríguez, A. (2018). Local and global knowledge complementarity: R&D collaborations and innovation of foreign and domestic firms. Journal of International Management, 24(2), 137-152.
Wooldridge, J, M. (2011). Introdução à econometria: uma abordagem moderna. São Paulo: Cengage Learning.
World Intelectual Property Report. (2019). Plant biotechnology connecting urban innovation and rural application. Retrieved January 15, 2021, from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_944_2019-chapter4.pdf
Zhang, F., Jiang, G., & Cantwell, J. A. (2019). Geographically dispersed technological capability building and MNC innovative performance: the role of intra-firm flows of newly absorbed knowledge. Journal of International Management, 25(3), 100669.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Internext
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigo às normas da publicação.
Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição 3.0 Não Adaptada, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) em http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
