Religious values and business angel investment decision-making: The influence of the Jewish ethos Tikkun Olam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v20i1.813Keywords:
Investment, Business Angels, Decision-Making, Religious Values, Tikkun Olam, Investor BehaviorAbstract
Objectives: This study investigates the role of religious values in the investment decision-making process of Jewish business angels (BAs), highlighting how the Jewish ethos Tikkun Olam influences their behavior. The concept provides a motivational and attitudinal orientation that guides their investment choices. Method: To explore Tikkun Olam's influence, the research conducted in-depth interviews with 15 Jewish BAs of different nationalities (France, Brazil, and Israel). The sample size was determined based on the concept of theoretical saturation, ensuring that no new themes emerged after the 15 interviews. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify dimensions related to Tikkun Olam in the respondents' narratives. Main results: The thematic analysis identified five main themes reflecting the influence of Tikkun Olam on the decision-making process of BAs. The first theme, "Collective Cohesion," showed that the respondents demonstrated a strong sense of responsibility toward their community, contributing through economic initiatives or altruistic help. The second theme, "Ethical Guidelines," highlighted how the pursuit of morality and consistency with personal and religious values guided investors to invest in ventures with a positive social impact. The third theme, "Improving the World," emphasized the investors' concern with social justice and environmental sustainability, driving them to seek companies that contribute to a better future. The fourth theme, "Never-Ending Search for Perfection," revealed a future-oriented mindset that encouraged investors to innovate and pursue changes that would improve the world. Finally, the fifth theme, "Belief in a Mystical Purpose," showed how belief in a higher power motivated investors to act with purpose, often basing their decisions on intuition and "gut feeling." Relevance / Originality and Theoretical Contributions: This study highlights how religious values shape BAs' decision-making, providing insights into how moral and religious elements influence high-risk investments. It also contributes to the literature by examining non-rational decision-making mechanisms, such as passion and intuition, and explores whether Jewish BAs exhibit distinct behaviors compared to non-religious BAs. The study proposes a conceptual framework that classifies the motivational and attitudinal orientations of investors based on Tikkun Olam. Managerial Contributions: Understanding moral biases allows BAs to refine their decision-making processes. Additionally, the study provides entrepreneurs with insights into the criteria that BAs use, facilitating better alignment between expectations and values.
Downloads
References
Adler, J. M., Dunlop, W. L., Fivush, R., Lilgendahl, J. P., Lodi-Smith, J., McAdams, D. P., McLean, K. C., Pasupathi, M., & Syed, M. (2017). Research methods for studying narrative identity: A primer. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(5), 519-527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617698202
Benjamin, D. J., Choi, J. J., & Fisher, G. (2016). Religious identity and economic behavior. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(4), 617-637. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00586
Blohm, I., Zogaj, S., Schwabe, G., & Leimeister, J. M. (2022). It’s a people's game, isn’t it?! A comparison between the investment returns of business angels and machine learning algorithms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(2), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720945206
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cardon, M. S., Wincent, J., Singh, J., & Drnovsek, M. (2009). The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 511-532. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.40633190
Cooper, L. (2013). The Assimilation of Tikkun Olam. Jewish Political Studies Review, 25(3/4), 10-42. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43150877
Dorff, E. N. (2007). The Way into Tikkun Olam. Jewish Lights.
Fauchart, E., & Gruber, M. (2011). Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935-957. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0211
Friedman, H. H. (2001). The impact of Jewish values on marketing and business practices. Journal of Macromarketing, 21(1), 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146701211007
Ganzin, M., Islam, G., & Suddaby, R. (2019). Spirituality and entrepreneurship: the role of magical thinking in future-oriented sensemaking. Organization Studies, 41(1), 77-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618819035
Grzeda, M. (2019). Tikkun Olam: exploring a spiritual path to sustainability. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 16(5), 413-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2019.1656665
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hsu, D. K., Haynie, J. M., Simmons, S. A., & McKelvie, A. (2014). What matters, matters differently: a conjoint analysis of the decision policies of angel and venture capital investors. Venture Capital, 16(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2013.825527
Huang, L., & Pearce, J. L. (2015). Managing the unknowable: the effectiveness of early-stage investor gut feel in entrepreneurial investment decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(4), 634-670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839215597270
Jung, L., & Levine, A. (1987). Business ethics in Jewish law. Hebrew Publishing Company.
Kahane, B. (2012). “Tikkun Olam”: how a Jewish ethos drives innovation. Journal of Management Development, 31(9), 938-947. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711211259884
Levine, A., & Pava, M. (Eds.) (1999). Jewish business ethics: The firm and its stakeholders. Jason Aronson.
Louche, C., Arenas, D., & Van Cranenburgh, K. C. (2012). From preaching to investing: attitudes of religious organisations towards responsible investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1155-8
Mason, C., & Harrison, R. (1996). Why “business angels” say no: a case study of opportunities rejected by an informal investor syndicate. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242696142003
Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3), 8. Retrieved from https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428/3027
Mason, C., & Stark, M. (2004). What do investors look for in a business plan? International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 22(3), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242604042377
Maxwell, A. L., Jeffrey, S. A., & Lévesque, M. (2011). Business angel early stage decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(2), 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.09.002
Murnieks, C. Y., Mosakowski, E., & Cardon, M. S. (2014). Pathways of passion: identity centrality, passion, and behavior among entrepreneurs. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1583-1606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311433855
Pasewark, W. R., & Riley, M. E. (2009). It’s a matter of principle: the role of personal values in investment decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0218-6
Raimi, L., Patel, A. & Aljadani, A. (2013). Exploring the theological foundation of Corporate Social Responsibility in Islam, Christianity and Judaism for Strengthening Compliance and Reporting: An eclectic approach. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 7(4), 228. https://doi.org/10.22164/isea.v7i4.112
Sørheim, R., Berg, M., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2007). Entrepreneurship education and the role of universities in entrepreneurship: Introduction to the special issue. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(5), 527-533. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701520613
Sørheim, R., & Landström, H. (2001). Informal investors : A categorization, with policy implications. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 13(4), 351-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620110066779
Sudek, R. (2006). Angel investment criteria. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 17(2), 89. Retrieved from https://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/jsbs/article/view/68
Taylor, K. P. (2019). Angel investor-entrepreneur fit: the nexus of angel motivation and entrepreneur personality and passion. In: A. Caputo & M. M. Pellegrini (eds.), Contributions to Management Science (pp. 197-210). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19685-1_9
Van Osnabrugge, M. (2000). A comparison of business angel and venture capitalist investment procedures: An agency theory-based analysis. Venture Capital, 2(2), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/136910600295729
Wetzel Jr., W. E. (1983). Angels and informal risk capital. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1505193
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ethel Berdugo, Gilberto Sarfati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;
- The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s);
- The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
- In case an article will be approved for publication, the author will sign the term of Cession of Copyright to the journal, according to the download form.