Dynamic capabilities for cooperation in Brazilian multinational and factors determining its management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18568/1980-4865.10157-69Keywords:
Dynamic Capabilities, Cooperation, Innovation, Brazilian MultinationalsAbstract
In the context of emerging companies’ growth, current challenges depend on the local generation of product and process innovations, as well as dynamic capability to generate innovative solutions cooperatively and new globe business models. The objective of this study is to analyse the determining managerial factors for the dynamic capability of cooperation in Brazilian multinationals (BMNs). A survey was conducted with a sample of 60 BMNs, and a structured questionnaire and statistical tests with factorial analysis and Cronbach's alpha were used. The aggregate analysis of the results indicates that BMNs are going through a transitional process between the operational capability of cooperation and the capability for dynamic cooperation, which are relevant to the continuous adaptation of already-established cooperative management routines and the evaluation and incorporation of the relational capability of management practices that consider systemic flows, open innovation and integrate strategic intentionality into cooperative processes.Downloads
References
ANDRADE, C. A. A. Inovação e Externalização: Uma Análise de Capabilities na Indústria Farmacêutica. 2010. 148 f. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção) – Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. 2010.
ASAKAWA, K.; NAKAMURA, H.; SAWADA, N. Firms' open innovation policies, laboratories' external collaborations, and laboratories' R&D performance. R&D Management, v. 40, n. 2, p. 109-123, 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00598.x
BARTLETT, C.; GHOSHAL, S. Gerenciando Empresas no Exterior: a Solução Transnacional. Trad. Maria Cláudia Santos Ratto. São Paulo: Makron Books, 1992.
BRUNEEL, J. ESTE, P. D.; SALTER, A. Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university – industry collaboration. Research Policy, v. 39, n. 7, p. 858-868, 2010. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006
CHESBROUGH, H.; VANHAVERBEKE, W.; WEST, J. Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
CHIARONI, D. CHIESA, V.; FRATTINI, F. Technovation The Open Innovation Journey : How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation, v. 31, n. 1, p. 34-43, 2011. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.007
CHIARONI, D.; CHIESA, V.; FRATTINI, F. Unravelling the process from Closed to Open Innovation: evidence from mature, asset‐intensive industries. R&D Management, v. 40, n. 3, p. 222-245, 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00589.x
CHIESA, V. Global R&D Project Management and Organization: a taxonomy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 17, n. 5, p. 341-359, 2000.
DOZ, Y.; SANTOS, J.; WILLIAMSON, P. From global to metanational. Ubiquity, v. 2, n. 40, p. 2, 2001.
ELSENHARDT, K. M.; MARTIN, J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they. Strategic management journal, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1105-1121, 2000. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
FERRO, A. F. P. Gestão da inovação aberta: práticas e competências em P&D Colaborativa. 2010. Tese (Doutorado em Política Científica e Tecnológica) Programa de Pós-Graduação em Política Científica e Tecnológica, Instituto de Geociências Universidade Estadual de Campinas. 2010.
GASSMANN, O.; ENKEL, E.; CHESBROUGH, H. The future of open innovation. R&D Management, v. 40, n. 3, p. 213-221, 2010.
GASSMANN, O.; ZEDTWITZ, M. V. New Concepts and Trends in International R&D Organization. Research Policy, v. 28, n. 2, p. 231-250, 1999. DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00114-0
GOERZEN, A. Alliance networks and firm performance: The impact of repeated partnerships. Strategic Management Journal, v. 28, n. 5, p. 487-509, 2007. DOI: 10.1002/smj.588
HAIR, J. F et al. Análise Multivariada de Dados. 5 ed. São Paulo: Bookman, 2005.
HEIMERIKS, K.H.; DUYSTERS, G.; VANHAVERBEKE, W. Learning mechanisms and differential performance in alliance portfolios. Strategic Organization, v. 5, n. 4, p. 373-408, 2007. DOI: 10.1177/1476127007083347
HELFAT, C. E. et al. Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change In Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.
HITT, M. A.; IRELAND, R. D.; HOSKISSON, R. E. Administração estratégica: competitividade e globalização. São Paulo: Thomson, 2008.
HOFFMANN, W. H. Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances. Strategic Management Journal, v. 28, n. 8, p. 827-856, 2007. DOI: 10.1002/smj.607
KERLINGER, F. N. Metodologia de Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais. São Paulo: EPU, 1980.
KIM, C.; SONG, J. Creating new technology through alliances: an empiricalinvestigation of joint patents. Technovation, v. 27, n. 8, p. 461–470, 2007. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.02.007
KOKA, B. R.; PRESCOTT, J. E. Designing alliance networks: The influence of network position, environmen-tal change, and strategy on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 29, n. 6, p. 639-661, 2008. DOI: 10.1002/smj.679
LEE, K-J. Frominterpersonal networksto inter-organizationalalliancesfor university–industrycollaborations inJapan:thecaseoftheTokyo Institute ofTechnology. R&DManagement, v. 41, n. 2, p. 190-201, 2011.
LEYDESDORFF, L.; MEYER, M. Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue. Research policy, v. 35, n. 10, p. 1441-1449, 2006.
LIMA, M. C. Monografia: a engenharia da produção acadêmica. 2. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2008.
LORENZONI, G.; LIPPARINI, A. The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management, v. 20, n. 4, p. 317-338, 1999. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199904)20:4<317::AID-SMJ28>3.0.CO;2-3
PORTO, et al. Gestão de P&D de empresas multinacionais brasileiras. In: FLEURY, A. (Org.). Gestão Empresarial para a Internacionalização das Empresa Brasileiras. São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.
POWELL, W. W.; KOPUT, K. W.; SMITH-DOERR, L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative science quarterly, v. 41, n. 1, p. 116-145, 1996. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393988
RAISCH, S.; BIRKINSHAW, J. Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, v. 34, n. 3, p. 375–409, 2008. DOI: 10.1177/0149206308316058
SCHILKE, O.; GOERZEN, A. Alliance Management Capability: An Investigation of the Construct and Its Measurement. Journal of Management, v. 36, n. 5, p.1192-1219, 2010. DOI: 10.1177/0149206310362102
SCHREINER, M. KALE, P.; CORSTEN, D. What really is alliance management capability and how does it impact alliance outcomes and success? Strategic Management Journal, v. 1419, n. 13, p. 1395-1419, 2009. DOI: 10.1002/smj.790
TEECE, D.J.; PISANO, G.; SHUEN, A. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, p. 509-533, 1997.
TEECE, D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 28, n. 13, p. 1319–1350, 2007. DOI: 10.1002/smj.640
TOMLINSON, P. R. Co-operative ties and innovation : Some new evidence for UK manufacturing. Research Policy, v. 39, n. 6, p. 762-775, 2010. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.010
WASSMER, U. Alliance Portfolios: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, v. 36, n. 1, p. 141-171, 2010. DOI: 10.1177/0149206308328484
WINTER, S. G. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic management journal, v. 24, n. 10, p. 991-995, 2003. DOI: 10.1002/smj.318
YAMAKAWA, Y. YANG, H.; JOHN, Z. Exploration versus exploitation in alliance portfolio : Performance implications of organizational, strategic, and environmental fit. Research Policy, v. 40, n. 2, p. 287-296, 2011. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.006.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 .
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;
- The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s);
- The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
- In case an article will be approved for publication, the author will sign the term of Cession of Copyright to the journal, according to the download form.